Article • August 20, 2025

The AI Multiplier Effect: How Technology Amplifies Strategic Conversations

By Jill Fenton and Marcy Lantzy

Insights from Keynote: Revolutionizing Learning, GE Healthcare’s Dashboard Revolution, Bayer’s AI Simulator Success, and Gilead’s Hack the Brain (presentations at LTEN 2025)


Artificial intelligence (AI) has a transformative power to drive speed and efficiency in learning and development (L&D) that seems almost magical.  Multiple case studies from four sessions at LTEN 2025 reveal a profound truth: The magic of AI doesn’t lie solely in its ability to automate many of our tasks.  Rather, it lies in its ability to free up cognitive space for higher order thinking and to amplify strategic human conversations that can drive improved business outcomes. In this way, technology solutions and human effort combine in a way that truly is greater than the sum of the parts.  This extends on an earlier analysis that our team performed on the successful use of human-technology integration for organizational transformation through enhanced strategic dialogue and collaboration.

The multiplier effect these technologies create when they elevate every conversation that matters, both inside organizations and with external stakeholders, can ignite real competitive advantage. It does this by complementing human insight with AI to strengthen human empathy, strategic thinking, and data-driven decision making in ways that create lasting value.

Beyond Efficiency to Conversation Revolution

The operational improvements from GE Healthcare’s metrics transformation and Bayer’s AI-powered verbal certifications were impressive, but predictable. GE Healthcare reduced dashboard development from 45-60 days to less than a minute. Development times for individual training metrics dropped from 1-2 weeks to instant generation. Bayer compressed their verbal certification process from 33 business days to 7 calendar days, eliminating 300+ hours of manual scheduling and administration.

While impressive, these time savings represent only surface-level benefits. The deeper transformation came when mundane tasks disappeared or were reduced, thereby freeing up space for more informed, frequent, and strategic human dialogue. GE Healthcare’s integrated data enabled L&D discussions that fundamentally repositioned learning from a cost center to a strategic imperative.

GE’s L&D leader shared: “My job is to ensure that I’m thinking: Are we a cost center at $12 million, or are we a strategic partner? Can I speak the business’ language?” The answer came when GE was able to leverage newly available data to tell human stories that showed how investing in the development of people could drive true business outcomes. As an example, this leader shared that “…those (newer reps) that have just gone through the Commercial Skills Program are outpacing what our 20+ veterans are doing.”

Similarly, Bayer’s AI simulator transformed verbal certifications from administrative hurdles into psychologically safe, strategic preparation tools. Their sales team had the ability to practice multiple times in the simulation environment before certification.  This enabled judgement-free skill development that made subsequent human coaching conversations more productive and strategic.

Bayer’s experience reveals how creating psychological safety through technology isn’t just about removing bias – it’s about establishing trust that enables deeper learning. When people feel safe to practice and fail, they engage more authentically in subsequent human coaching conversations. As a member of their learning development team noted, the AI simulator eliminated unconscious bias: “Either you know the data or you don’t, that’s it. We told the AI, here’s all the data points we want them to cover. And either you said it or you didn’t, you cannot schmooze your way through it.”

Both transformations reveal that AI’s greatest impact isn’t just operational efficiency, it’s conversational intelligence. When leaders have instant access to performance data that tells clear business stories, they can engage in strategic discussions that were previously constrained by information gaps and reporting delays.  This shift from data gathering to data interpretation enables evidence-based conversations that directly translate internal improvements into competitive market advantage.

Why Working With Human Nature is Key

These successes align with Malcolm Knowles’ foundational principles of adult learning: adults are self-directed learners who need to understand the relevance of new information and want to immediately apply it in real-world contexts (Knowles, 1984)¹. Both AI implementations succeeded because they honored these principles rather than fighting against human nature.

The transformations illuminate four critical reasons why human dialogue remains essential:

1. Contextual Interpretation: AI identifies patterns, but humans determine whether performance variations reflect training gaps, market conditions, or coaching effectiveness.

2. Emotional Engagement: Data alone doesn’t drive behavior change—emotional engagement does. Competitive framing and professional identity create motivation that algorithms cannot replicate.

3. Strategic Priority: While AI optimizes for efficiency, humans determine strategic priorities. Both organizations succeeded because human leaders made strategic decisions about what conversations would matter most to business outcomes.

4. Relationship Building: AI amplifies human capability exponentially, creating conditions for trust. That trust enables deeper learning and performance improvement.  

Strategic Implications for Learning Leaders

Organizations that recognize AI’s greatest contribution—enabling strategic human conversations—will separate themselves from competitors who view technology as merely an efficiency tool. This requires a fundamental mindset shift from “How can we automate our processes?” to “How can we amplify our most important human capabilities?”

Saving time is only valuable if organizations simultaneously develop the human capabilities to use that time strategically. This requires learning solutions that help people transition from task-oriented work to insight-driven leadership—exactly the kind of complex behavioral change that demands both learning science expertise and deep industry knowledge to make it sustainable.

AI implementations succeed when they enhance rather than replace human strategic capability.  L&D teams will need to deliver learning programs fully capitalize on—and properly develop—the cognitive capacity that’s freed up by technology solutions.

The Salience Learning Perspective: Sustainable Human-AI Integration

These case studies reinforce our fundamental approach: sustainable transformation happens when we work with human nature rather than against it. At Salience Learning, we understand that adults bring rich professional experiences to every learning interaction, and technology should amplify rather than replace human judgement and contextual understanding.

Both GE and Bayer succeeded because they honored Malcolm Knowles’ adult learning fundamentals: adults need contextual relevance, immediate application, and self-directed engagement. The use of AI in these examples worked precisely because they supported rather than subverted natural learning processes.

Cognitive science underpins this dynamic. George A. Miller’s research² in 1956 showed that adults have a very limited ability to simultaneously process multiple pieces of information. AI, however, reduces cognitive load by handling data compilation. This frees mental capacity for higher-order strategic thinking and dialogue. At GE, people could focus on pattern interpretation rather than spreadsheet management. At Bayer, they could focus on skill development rather than evaluation anxiety.

At Salience Learning, we synthesize cutting-edge learning science with deep life sciences industry knowledge. We don’t just deliver content—we solve real-world problems by connecting theory with immediately applicable learning solutions that drive measurable, sustainable business outcomes.  Our goal is to design learning interventions that help people transition from task-oriented work to insight-driven leadership, exactly what these successful AI implementations achieved.

The industry’s next leap forward will come from organizations that recognize AI’s true potential: not as a replacement for human intelligence, but as the catalyst that elevates every conversation that matters—whether it’s strategic planning sessions, coaching interactions, customer engagements, or cross-functional collaborations—to create exponential returns on technology investments.

Salience Learning specializes in designing learning solutions that amplify the human potential that AI makes possible. Learn more about our approach to sustainable transformation at www.saliencelearning.com.

References:

  1. Knowles, M. (1984). Andragogy in Action. Jossey-Bass.
  2. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.